A fracture is a break in the bone resulting in loss of function and pain. Few decades back all fracture were managed by, plaster of pairs castsor treated with weights hanging from bed.  With improvements in metal technology, advances in anesthesia, and research more and more surgeries are performed for fracture. But does all fracture need surgery? Can we still use plaster of pairs?

Many fractures like wrist fractures in old people, children’s fractures (called  greenstick fractures), arm bone fractures, some spine  bone fractures (without spinal cord injury) can be treated without surgery  some fractures definitely need surgery and some can be managed by both forms of treatment.

Generally speaking fractures through joint (called intra-articular fracture) definitely requires surgery; Because the joints which is a place where 2 bones meet and give movements require  smooth surfaces. If the surfaces are rough of uneven due to fractures the smooth movement of joint is lost and pain results. Hence perfect  positioning of fracture fragments are necessary to get best result in fractures  through joints. Common  fracture through joints which require surgery are ankle fractures, Knee fractureKnee fracture forearm and wrist joint fracture. So to reiterate ”All through the joints require surgery”.

Some fracture which heal quicker and better with surgery compared to plaster of paris immobilization. For example, fractures of the collar bones are healed better with surgery than bandages. Similarly fractures of thigh bone, hip bone, leg bone are better operated than treated with plaster cast. The bone fragments may not be correctly aligned inside plaster cast and reduction  will be lost. This can lead to  deformities like bending of bone or angulations at fracture site.

Also hip  fractures  will either not heal or heal in a deformed position if  treated without surgery ,hence surgery is better option here. Fracture surgery is done using metallic plates and screws or long rods inserted into the bone or sometimes with pins and rods outside the bone and skin (External fixator).Surgery  is done under local or general anesthesia depending on site of fracture.

Advantages of surgery:

  1. Better positioning of broken bony fragments
  2. Reliable fixation of bone ends, compared to plaster cast fixation of bone ends, compared to plaster cast
  3. Quicker healing times
  4. Precisemia intenaance of reduction in fractures through joints
  5. Avoiding plaster helps in moving joints near the fracture
  6. No itching or skin dryness under cast.

Disadvantages of surgery:

  1. Scar
  2. Infections
  3. Failure of healing

Native bone setters-native bone setters are there in all parts of our state from  putthoor to thalavoor. People flock to them fearing surgery and high medical costs. Though they can get away with fractures away from joints, joint fractures are a total failure in traditional bone setters. Many times people end up with deformities and non healing  of fractures. Also excessive tight bandages can lead to stopping of blood supply in injured limb and cause death of cells; sometimes leading to amputation. Hence better to avoid quacks and traditional bone setters who do not set bone precisely.

Your orthopaedician is the best judge to decide whether a particular fracture requires surgery or not.


M.B.B.S.,M.S.,(ortho)M.CH.,ortho (UK),FASIF (Aust)

Orthopaedic Surgeon | MEDICAL DIRECTOR